As opposed to blind firing through the door which prompted the burglars to return fire at a target they couldn’t see themselves. The question is what was he really at risk of? The iron king shirt Being assaulted? Less than %3 of cases, even less for him as a child. Whereas the odds of him getting shot by the return fire after he failed to incapacitate either intruder was sheer dumb luck.
The iron king shirt
it’s not about some ideal world, it’s here in the real world that the evidence shows would-be burglars don’t do what you’re hypothetically trying to protect yourself from, or claiming this kid was at risk of. It’s not a matter of acceptable risk, it’s about balancing the potential threat of armed intruders (low, and getting lower) against the threat of you or a child at risk of self-inflicted injury/death (on the rise). You can be prepared for both and still own a gun, but no part of that is glorifying scenarios like these as a way to justify easy access to guns for children.
No one is calling you a psycho or a killer, Chris, it’s just that you’re not engaging in a realistic evaluation of threats. You’re positing a situation much less likely than being struck by lightning, and just as outside your control (since it’s really a matter of securing your home, The iron king shirt being in the right place to avoid risk). no the question is whether he was at more or less risk upon picking up a gun. Weighing the risk of him possibly being injured in a burglary, which the DOJ study indicates is statistically unlikely to the point that in their entire study back in 2010 they couldn’t find a single death.