Because men sometimes forget to act like a real man and take control of a situation rather then allowing the situation to control them. Son Guku any man can be a father but it takes someone special to be an asshole dad When the arguments have passed and cooled down, then what it’s not ok to just give up.
Son Guku any man can be a father but it takes someone special to be an asshole dad shirt
Where in her comment did she say it was true of all or most marriages in that day? She said very clearly that this was the political climate of those days. And she’s right. Of course, whoever had a good relationship was unaffected by it– Son Guku any man can be a father but it takes someone special to be an asshole dad and we’re all happy for them. But those who were being abused, had no way out. The longevity of an abusive marriage is to be mourned, not celebrated. That is over simplifying thing just a bit, don’t you think? i’m sure that is true to some of the marraiges from back in the day, but certainly not all
Show me your choices and have fun
it actually says so quite explicitly in her comment. I think her final sentence quite reliably synthesizes her main premise, and yours too. Interestingly, abused women STILL stick around, regardless of the independence they can secure. Rather than painting such a bleak picture of mutual abuse (not forgetting the entirety of the family’s wherewithal befalling the male workhorse), I think it serves to point out that most couples were happier then because the nuclear unit was more sound, and objectives were complementary and more easily aligned. And yet what benefits do men get from marriage? In fact what benefits do men have in society today over women at all if any? Women have full rights to their children, men must spend coin and fight to find the best Lawyers to achieve 50/50 custody of their own children, because they don’t have equal rights to their children.